急

Dragonfly · 发表于 2003-4-18 23:18:51

o, ic, his question is not for me.
thx

CNOOC · 发表于 2003-4-18 23:29:31

他的问题当然是在对你说的，我回答的是另一个问题啊。

Dragonfly · 发表于 2003-4-18 23:44:49

[quote:19f4d975b3="CNOOC"]他的问题当然是在对你说的，我回答的是另一个问题啊。[/quote]

a? i am confused.... :-( :-( :-(

CNOOC · 发表于 2003-4-18 23:54:55

He asked you for your code. I answered his question about why he should post his code with [code] tab.

Dragonfly · 发表于 2003-4-19 00:27:36

my code? i already figure out where is the error. so i need not write the code.

CNOOC · 发表于 2003-4-19 00:34:14

but he wanted you to write a complete code for him, not just pointed out the error.

Dragonfly · 发表于 2003-4-19 00:56:12

hehe, i do not have such habit. this is u idea, not his, right?

CNOOC · 发表于 2003-4-19 03:15:20

How could you think it that way? That wasn't my question. Besides, he used c, not c++. I got nothing to understand c.

Dragonfly · 发表于 2003-4-19 03:22:03

u understand c++ without c knowledge. admire. at least i know c but do not know c++.
u seems not to be in china. otherwise keep posting at such a time.

CNOOC · 发表于 2003-4-19 05:44:20

Well, my campus doesn't teach c. We learn C++ directly. If I want to learn c, I have to go to the other campus with the same school (My school has different campuses in different part of city). People don't need to understand c before they study C++. I understand that C++ is OOD, and C is different idea.

CNOOC · 发表于 2003-4-19 05:47:32

You seem familiar with both C and C++, quit conning me.

Dragonfly · 发表于 2003-4-19 10:21:49

yes, but people without programming experience will feel confused and can not understand well about c++. at least i think so.

CNOOC · 发表于 2003-4-19 11:12:28

I disagree.

I think it would be a good start that learning C++ directly than learning C first.

Dragonfly · 发表于 2003-4-19 11:17:16

can u really understand ood and oop? if u do not have many experience, u can not quite understand why c++ is better than c.
of course, u maybe understand it well. hehe.

CNOOC · 发表于 2003-4-19 11:34:46

Since I am a bad student (always sleep in class), I don't quite remember how my professor talked about the differences between Object-oriented programming and Structured (or procedual) programming.

What I understand is it:

Structured programming combines a series interacting functions without consider the data, in other words, the data is considered a passive quantity to be acted upon by constrol structures and functions.

The Object-oriented programming uses data abstraction, inheritance, and dynamic binding to construct programs.

I admit I don't know how C exactly works. And I don't know why people always says "C isn't an object-oriented" (I shouldn't sleep in class anymore...........let's take it to the library

). So, could you explain to me a little bit?

		自动登录	找回密码
密码			注册